Flat 7, Surridge Court, Clapham Road, Stockwell, London, SW9 9AG
LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0608 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 23 Jun 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the apportioned grounds maintenance contracted and responsive works charges for 2018 to 2023, totalling £586.83, payable under the lease, and made no order under section 20C or paragraph 5A.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hyde Housing Association |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £586.83 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Hyde Housing Association
- years
The Application related to past years 2018 to 2023 and future years
- outcome
the Tribunal determines that this amount is payable and reasonable.
- total demanded
The Respondent has charged £586.83 for the
- total payable
the Tribunal therefore finds this amount is payable.
- s20c
the Tribunal does not make these orders.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.