Flat 7 Regents Court, West Street, Gravesend DA11 0BT
CHI/29UG/LIS/2020/0048 · LIS · Gravesham · decided 26 Mar 2021
The tribunal found the leaseholder liable for the interim service charges for 2017 to 2020, but the £276.02 external decoration charge for 2016 was not payable under the lease, and the year-end credits for 2017 to 2019 were set at £23.72, £16.45 and £35.40.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Regents Court Estate Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 65 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £9,690.24 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a modern block of some 65 retirement homes
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold owner of Regents Court, West Street,
- years
for the 2016 to 2020 service charge years
- outcome
the sum of £276.02 referred to in this application is not payable under the terms of the Lease.
- items reduced
The Tribunal has considered the charge of £276.02 which was demanded on 27 September 2016 for external decorations.
- total demanded
service charges of £9,690.24
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.