Flat 7, Lauriston Place, 150 Southchurch Avenue, Southend SS1 2PF
CAM/00KF/LBC/2022/0012 · breach of lease · Southend-on-Sea · decided 12 Dec 2022
The Tribunal found that the leaseholder breached the lease between June 2020 and November 2021 by using the flat for short-term holiday lettings rather than as a private residence for one family, and ordered him to pay the landlord's application and hearing fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chancery Lane Investments Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's application fee of £100 and hearing fee of £200 within 14 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Respondent has breached the covenants in clause 3(4) and paragraph 1 of the Third Schedule to the Lease between June 2020 and November 2021.
- costs
we order the Respondent to pay the Applicant’s application fee of £100 and hearing fee of £200 within 14 days
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.