Flat 69 Cavensidh Court, Woolacombe Road, Portland, Dorset DT5 2HY
CHI/19UJ/LBC/2022/0004 · breach of lease · Dorset · decided 16 Jun 2022
The tribunal found the applicant had not proved that the respondent breached clause 3(5) of his lease by installing patio doors, as consent may have been given, and it refused the applicant's application for costs against the respondent.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tapestart Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Tapestart acquired the Freehold possibly in 2013
- outcome
The Tribunal finds therefore that the Applicant has not proved on the balance of probabilities that the Respondent has breached the terms of Clause 3(5) of his lease.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.