Flat 68 St John’s Wood Court London NW8 8QS
LON/00BK/LSC/2023/0071 · service charges · Westminster · decided 2 Jan 2024
The tribunal found the disputed staff wages, staff flat, fire alarm and communal fire door charges payable and reasonable, made no s.20C order, and dismissed the respondent's application for costs under Rule 13.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | St John’s Wood Court Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Faraday Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 91 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £10,363.47 |
| Total found payable | £21,995 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of 91 separate flats, plus a staff flat
- freeholder
Respondents : St John’s Wood Court Limited
- agent
Faraday Property Management Ltd (Faraday), the managing agents engaged by the Respondent
- years
the replacement of the fire alarm for the block in 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the service charges sought in respect of staff wages of £132,873 in respect of the block for the year ending April 2022 are payable and reasonable.
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make a s.20C Order to restrict the charges payable by the Applicant arising from this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.