Flat 6 Oaks Court, 226-228 Cann Hall Road London E11 3NF
LON/00BH/LSC/2023/0140 · service charges · Waltham Forest · decided 11 Oct 2023
The tribunal found the service charges for 2014/15 and 2015/16 not recoverable, the charges for 2016/17 to 2020/21 recoverable but not currently payable because the demands lacked an accountant's certificate, and the current apportionment reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cann Hall Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 13 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £9,303.49 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
All 13 flats share a car park and external communal area.
- freeholder
Respondent : Cann Hall Limited
- agent
Vectra Freehold Management Ltd (‘Vectra’), the Respondent’s managing agent
- years
service charge years 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 are not recoverable
- outcome
(1) The service charges demanded for the service charge years 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 are not recoverable.
- total demanded
the total value in dispute stated in the application to be £9,303.49.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.