Flat 6, Millers Court, Borstal Hill, Whitstable, Kent CT5 4QB
CHI/29UC/LBC/2023/0020 · breach of lease · Canterbury · decided 22 May 2024
The tribunal found the leaseholder in breach of the private residence covenant by letting the flat through short-term Airbnb bookings, but found no breach of the covenant on payment of enforcement costs and refused the landlord's costs application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ashlar Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's application for costs refused; no costs ordered against the respondent |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Ashlar Investments Limited
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the Respondent is in breach of the provisions of clause 2 and paragraph 1 of the Second Schedule of his lease of the Property.
- costs
the Applicant's application for payment of its costs by the Respondent is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.