Flat 6 Chalvington House, Ocklynge Road, Eastbourne, BN21 1PZ
CHI/21UC/LSC/2021/0004 · service charges · Eastbourne · decided 28 Apr 2021
The Tribunal found that the roof replacement works were necessary, that the Section 20 consultation requirements were met, and that the sum of £7,646.60 demanded by the managing agent is reasonable and payable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,646.60 |
| Total found payable | £7,646.60 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
reroofing a block of 12 flats in 2021
- years
reroofing a block of 12 flats in 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £7,646.60 referred to in Stredder Pearce’s demand of 5 December 2019 is reasonable and payable.
- total demanded
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £7,646.60 referred to in Stredder Pearce’s demand of 5 December 2019 is reasonable and payable.
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £7,646.60 referred to in Stredder Pearce’s demand of 5 December 2019 is reasonable and payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.