Flat 6, Brampton Place, Walfords Close, Old Harlow, Essex CM17 0DG
CAM/12UD/LBC/2020/0004 · breach of lease · Harlow · decided 7 Apr 2021
The tribunal adjourned the application for six months to allow negotiation and gave preliminary views that the respondents had not complied with the lease on quarterly estimated demands and the requirement to audit the accounts, and that no statutory wording required by s21B was given, while making no decision on the s20 issues.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Limited (1) Topcott Developments Limited |
| Management company | Walfords Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,733.69 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Walfords is a tenant owned management company set up in the lease
- years
estimated service charges on a quarterly basis from April 2014 to September 2018
- outcome
it was agreed that the proceedings should be adjourned for 6 months
- total demanded
sought to establish that the sum of £5,733.69 was outstanding in respect of service charges up to and including July 2020
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 1 Dec 2020.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.