Flat 6, 2 Boleyn Road, London N16 8EP
· other · Hackney · decided 21 Apr 2021
The tribunal found the leaseholder liable for the 2017/2018 balancing service charge of £1,599.40, which had been reduced to arrears of £692.84 as at 23 November 2020 after accounting for payments made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Network Homes Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, management fees, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,599.40 |
| Total found payable | £1,599.40 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Network Homes Limited
- years
balancing payment for the actual service charges incurred in the service charge year 2017/2018
- outcome
The tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the sum of £1,599.40 claimed by the Respondent as the balancing payment
- total demanded
liable to pay the sum of £1,599.40 claimed by the Respondent as the balancing payment
- total payable
The tribunal finds that the Applicant is liable to pay the sum of £1,599.40 claimed by the Respondent as the balancing payment
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.