Flat 6, 152 Goswell Road London EC1V 7DY
LON/00AU/LBC/2020/0001 · breach of lease · Islington · decided 6 Oct 2020
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found breaches of some lease covenants admitted by the respondents (clauses 3(f) and 3(s)), rejected the other alleged breaches, and made an order that the landlord's tribunal costs cannot be passed through the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ground Rent Trading Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2005 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a one bedroom flat in a block of 8 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Ground Rent Trading Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for an order that a breach of covenant or a condition in the lease has occurred
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.