Flat 6, 14 Woodcroft Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2XW
CHI/21UC/LSC/2019/0007 · service charges · Eastbourne · decided 3 Oct 2019
The parties agreed a £25 per garage insurance credit (£375 a year), and the tribunal held that the reserve fund roof-repair question, the unpaid management fees and the handling of service charge funds were hypothetical or outside its jurisdiction.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Terrance Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Symon Smith & Partners |
| Building | One flat, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the 18 flats (including the Property) and 18 garages
- freeholder
Respondent : Terrance Investments Limited
- agent
Symon Smith & Partners or another Royal Bank of Scotland account in the
- years
for the years 2013 to 2018 compiled by Symon Smith &
- outcome
To that extent, the Applicant’s question was hypothetical and therefore not within our jurisdiction.
- items reduced
was for a credit of £25 to be applied in respect of each of the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.