Flat 5A, Harrytown Hall, Romiley, Stockport SK6 3BT

MAN/00BS/LSC/2020/0079 · service charges · Stockport · decided 12 May 2022

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal found it has no jurisdiction over the 1/8th apportionment under clause 3(i)(d) because the applicant agreed to it, set the due proportion for clause 3(i)(b) at 12.4% using adjusted floor areas, rejected the landlord's estoppel arguments on apportionment, and limited the landlord's recoverable costs of the proceedings to 10% under section 20C.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Harrytown Hall Maintenance Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 11 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2015
Items in dispute	cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: alterations to 3 of the 11 flats
freeholder: the Respondent will remain her landlord
years: for the service charge years October 2015 – September 2021

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.