Flat 57 Riverside Apartments, Goodchild Road, London N4 2BA
LON/00AM/LSC/2024/0149 · service charges · Hackney · decided 3 Jan 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found most of the challenged service charges payable in full, disallowed a £293.08 heating/water cartridge charge and reduced management fees for 2019/20 and 2020/21 because of poor management by a former agent, and refused the leaseholders' costs applications.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Berkeley Seventy Seven Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Berkeley Seventy Seven Ltd
- years
The application concerns various service charges between account years 2018/2019 and 2023/2024.
- outcome
The management fees for 2019/20 are reduced by £15.48 and the management fees for 2020/21 are reduced by £73.15.
- items reduced
The £293.08 charge for the frese cartridge / frissor restrictor (under the ‘heating/water’ head of charge) is not payable.
- s20c
The Applicants’ applications for a cost order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and for a cost order under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 are both refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.