Flat 55 Pullman Haul, 39 New England Street, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 4LS
CHI/00ML/LSC/2020/0041 · service charges · Brighton and Hove · decided 25 Jan 2021
The tribunal found the disputed 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 service charges for the flat payable and reasonable, treating the advance payments for planned decoration and electrical works as payable at that stage, while noting that section 20 consultation on the works would matter later.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Moat Homes Limited |
| Management company | One Brighton (New England Quarter) Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Stiles Harold Williams LLP |
| Building | One flat, 63 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Block F (“Pullman Haul”) is an eight-storey building with 63 residential apartments
- freeholder
The First Respondent to the Application is the head leaseholder landlord, Moat Homes Limited
- management company
the Second Respondent is [name] ([name] England Quarter) Management Limited, the Management Company under Moat’s headlease
- agent
appointed Stiles Harold Williams LLP to manage the development
- years
for the service charge years 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 and 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019
- outcome
The disputed service charges for Flat 55 Pullman Haul in 2017-2018 and 2018- 2019 were payable and reasonable in amount.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.