Flat 54 Mill View Tower, Liverpool, L8 6AG
MAN/00BY/LSC/2019/0003 · service charges · Liverpool · decided 26 Jan 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal approved a settlement, struck out the claim about four cash withdrawals as rent outside its jurisdiction, found the remaining accountancy, toilet, lightning conductor and electrical report costs reasonable and payable, and made orders under section 20C and paragraph 5A so the landlord's tribunal costs cannot be charged to the applicant.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tuscola FC101 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Regent Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 64 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The block of flats contains 64 flats and each lease will have a similar provision
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] FC101 Limited aka Rockwell (FC101) Limited
- agent
Initially, the landlord was represented by Mr [name], a director of the management agent, Regent Property Management Limited
- years
In service charge year 2015 £9,883.33
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the costs are chargeable as service charge costs and that they are reasonable and allowed in full.
- s20c
The Tribunal decides that it is fair and just to make an order that all of the costs incurred, by the landlord (Respondent) in connection with proceedings before this First-tier Tribunal are not to be regarded as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.