Flat 54, Maddren Way, Middlesbrough, TS5 5BD
MAN/00EC/LSC/2021/0078 · service charges · Middlesbrough · decided 2 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal reduced the reserve fund contribution charged to the applicant to £24,334 because the cladding replacement cost was overstated, and found the £1,162.50 management fee for redecoration of the communal hallway reasonable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sinclair Garden Investments (Kensington) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | First Management Ltd. trading as Hurst Managements |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £1,186.57 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Premises is one of thirty flats in a purpose-built three-storey residential block
- freeholder
The Respondent, Sinclair Garden Investments (Kensington) Limited, is the landlord of the Premises
- agent
All property management functions are delegated to First Management Ltd. trading as Hurst Managements.
- years
for the 2020/21 service charge year.
- outcome
The sum of £23,018.00 needs to be substituted for the original figure of £38,300.00.
- items reduced
The sum of £23,018.00 needs to be substituted for the original figure of £38,300.00.
- total demanded
showing the amount due as £1,186.57 payable within 21 days
- s20c
in the present case it does not make any costs orders in favour or against either of the parties
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.