Flat 5 Stourcliffe Close Stourcliffe Street London W1H 5AQ
LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0404 · service charges · Westminster · decided 22 Jun 2020
The tribunal found the porter service charges for the years ending March 2016 to March 2019 reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, and made a partial section 20C order that 25% of the respondent's proceedings costs cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Stourcliffe Close RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 59 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 59 flats over two blocks each with its own entrance
- management company
Respondent : Stourcliffe Close RTM Company Limited
- years
service charges years ending March 2016, March 2017, March 2018 and
- outcome
service charges for the porterage at this block are reasonable and payable by the applicant.
- s20c
An order be made under section 20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in the terms set out below.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.