Flat 5, Q Block, Peabody Estate, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 9QU
LON/00AN/LSC/2024/0123 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 25 Feb 2025
The tribunal decided that a £560.43 excess in block electricity costs for 2022/23 is unreasonable and not payable by the leaseholder, and ordered the landlord to refund the £100 application fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Peabody Trust |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant the £100 application fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built block of 10 flats on 4 floors
- freeholder
Respondent : Peabody Trust
- years
for the service charge year ended 31 March 2023
- outcome
the difference of £560.43 between the estimated and actual block electricity costs is unreasonable and not payable by the applicant
- items reduced
the difference of £560.43 between the estimated and actual block electricity costs is unreasonable and not payable by the applicant
- costs
makes an order requiring the respondent to reimburse the applicant the £100 application fee paid with 14 days
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.