Flat 5 Neville Court, 33 Canning Road, Croydon, London, CR0 6QE
LON/00AH/LSC/2024/0683 · service charges · Croydon · decided 27 Oct 2025
The tribunal decided that no service charges are payable for 2020 to 2024 until valid statutory demands are produced, that reserve fund and payments on account are not payable, and that the £410 sum is not a service charge, while management fees and garage charges are payable and reasonable; a section 20C order was made and the Rule 13 application was dismissed.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prime Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Prime Property Management
- years
2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, actual charges, and 2024 and 2025,
- outcome
The tribunal determines that no service charges relating to reserve fund
- items reduced
the sum of £410 demanded by the
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.