Flat 5, Highfield Court, 14-16 Church Road, Haywards Heath, RH16 3PA

HAV/00ML/LAC/2025/0022 · administration charges · Mid Sussex · decided 18 Aug 2026

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction because the £120 fee for registering an assured shorthold tenancy was not an administration charge under Schedule 11, so the application was dismissed.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Grays Inn Capital Limited
Management company	Highfield Court (Haywards Heath) Management Company Limited
Managing agent	Simarc Property Management Limited
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: First Respondent : Grays Inn Capital Limited
agent: its agents, [name] Property Management Limited
outcome: the application is dismissed
s20c: I do not see any reason to make any order under either s.20C of the 1985 Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.