Flat 5 Garwoods Lodge,421 High Road,London,N22 8JU
LON/00AP/LSC/2025/0954 · service charges · Haringey · decided 6 Mar 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the estate charge costs recharged to the leaseholder by the landlord are payable under the lease, and that she had also agreed to them, so her challenge failed and no costs orders were made against her.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Premises are within a block containing 11 purpose built flats.
- years
the service charge periods for which she is challenging these costs as 2020 to 2025
- outcome
are payable under the terms of the Applicant’s lease.
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses the Applicant’s request for orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.