Flat 5 Chapel Apartments, 10 Hawley Square, Margate, Kent, CT9 1PF
CHI/29UN/LIS/2020/0055 · LIS · Thanet · decided 15 Mar 2021
The Tribunal found the £13,662.11 demanded for remedial works to the building reasonable and payable, refused the paragraph 5A application, and left the set-off and costs questions to the county court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Dewstar Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Dewstar Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £13,662.11 |
| Total found payable | £13,662.11 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the Tribunal proceedings as assessed at £3,525.00 as administration charg |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
now consists of some 15 flats
- freeholder
The Applicant is said to be the managing agent of Dewstar Ltd.
- outcome
the amount that is reasonable and payable is £13,662.11
- total demanded
demand for £13,662.11 which is for substantial works of repair to the building
- total payable
the amount that is reasonable and payable is £13,662.11
- costs
The total that the Tribunal would consider to be reasonable is therefore £3,525.00.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.