Flat 5 Cadnam Lodge, 34 Schooner Close, London E14 3GQ
LON/00BG/LAC/2026/0009 · administration charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 20 Aug 2026
figures not yet checkedThe administration charges were withdrawn by the respondent after the application was made, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to repay £170, half of the tribunal fees paid by the applicant.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Millenium Court (No.4) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Platinum Associates Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant £170 being half the tribunal fees paid |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] Court (No.4) Limited
- agent
Representative : Platinum Associates Ltd
- outcome
the Respondent agreed to withdraw the claim for administration charges
- costs
the sum of £170 being half the fees paid to the Tribunal in respect of the Application and the Hearing fee, within 28 days.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.