Flat 5, 5 Bridge House, 74c Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QT
LON/00BD/LSC/2018/0312 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 1 Oct 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the service charges for 2014 to 2019 reasonable and payable by the applicant, apart from items withdrawn or to be reapportioned, and made no costs order under section 20C or paragraph 5A against the applicant.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Bridge House Residents’ Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Snellers Property Consultants Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Bridge House Residents’ Management Company Limited
- agent
Snellers Property Consultants Limited to act as managing agents for the building
- years
the years in dispute should be limited to 2014 – 2019 inclusive
- s20c
we do not make such Orders
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.