Flat 5, 10 High Street, Herne Bay, CT6 5LH
CHI/29UC/LIS/2019/0029 · LIS · Canterbury · decided 30 Aug 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the 2018/19 service charges of £1854.88 payable in full and granted the landlord dispensation from the consultation requirements for the fire alarm works.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 10 High Street Herne Bay Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,854.88 |
| Total found payable | £1,854.88 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : 10 High Street Herne Bay Ltd
- years
service charge in respect of the year 2018/19 and possibly 2019/20
- outcome
In summary the Tribunal finds in favour of the Applicant in the sum of £1854.88
- total demanded
The total value of the service charge in dispute was therefore £ 1854.88.
- total payable
finds in favour of the Applicant in the sum of £1854.88
- s20
grants dispensation under Section 20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.