Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CT6 5LH

Flat 5, 10 High Street, Herne Bay, CT6 5LH

CHI/29UC/LIS/2019/0029 · LIS · Canterbury · decided 30 Aug 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the 2018/19 service charges of £1854.88 payable in full and granted the landlord dispensation from the consultation requirements for the fire alarm works.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord10 High Street Herne Bay Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 4 flats
Service charge years in dispute2018
Items in disputeadministration charges, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£1,854.88
Total found payable£1,854.88
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : 10 High Street Herne Bay Ltd
years
service charge in respect of the year 2018/19 and possibly 2019/20
outcome
In summary the Tribunal finds in favour of the Applicant in the sum of £1854.88
total demanded
The total value of the service charge in dispute was therefore £ 1854.88.
total payable
finds in favour of the Applicant in the sum of £1854.88
s20
grants dispensation under Section 20ZA

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.