Flat 48 Miller Court, Mayplace Road East, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA7 6DJ
LON/00AD/LSC/2021/0362 · service charges · Bexley · decided 9 Mar 2022
The tribunal found the cost of the Scheme Officer for 2020/2021 reasonable and payable in full at £608.24, dismissing the applicant's challenge to a reduction in charges for periods of home working during the pandemic, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hyde Housing Association Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £608.24 |
| Total found payable | £608.24 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Hyde Housing Association Limited
- years
the service charge year 2020/2021
- outcome
The tribunal finds that the charges incurred in respect of the provision of a Scheme Officer for the service charge year 2020/2021 are reasonable and payable in the sum demanded
- total demanded
payable in the sum demanded of the applicant amounting to £608.24
- total payable
payable in the sum demanded of the applicant amounting to £608.24
- s20c
The tribunal declines to make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant and under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.