Flat 45, The Elms, St. John’s St, Luton, LU1 2EE
CAM/00KA/LSC/2022/0046 · service charges · Luton · decided 8 Dec 2022
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal dismissed the application and found the disputed cold water pump replacement, the 2020 balancing deficit, and the electricity and refuse removal charges reasonable and payable, and refused the section 20C application.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Michael Laurie Magar Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 52 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is in a flat a building of 52 flats, built in about 2017.
- years
(2) Invoice, 23 June 2022, for deficit for year ending 24 March 2020
- outcome
The Tribunal dismisses the application and determines that all the relevant costs challenged by the Applicant were costs reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount.
- s20c
the Applicants’ application under s.20C/para 5A fails
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.