Flat 45, Nova House, 1 Buckingham Gardens, Slough SL1 1AY
CAM/00MD/LIS/2019/0006 · LIS · Slough · decided 25 Sep 2019
The Tribunal found no service charges were payable for 2015, made a section 20C order in the leaseholder's favour, and found the 2017 to 2019 budgets and accounts reasonable, with a £302.40 invoice to be deducted from the 2016 charges.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ground Rent Estates 5 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Ringley Limited |
| Building | One flat, 68 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, other, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
for the 68 residents in the building
- freeholder
Respondent : Ground Rent Estates 5 Limited
- agent
Ringley Limited are the appointed managing agents
- years
The hand written application seeks to challenge the years 2015 to 2019 inclusive
- outcome
we felt it appropriate to consider the service charges that have been claimed but accept that we can make no specific findings which bind Freehold 42
- items reduced
it seems to us that the sum of £302.40 should be deducted from the maintenance charge as there is no clear evidence that this applied to the subject Property
- s20c
we make an order for section 20C to apply in this case we considering it just and equitable so to do
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.