Flat 4 The Haven, North Road, Sandwich Bay, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9PJ
HAV/29UE/LBC/2024/0602 · breach of lease · Dover · decided 16 Oct 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the respondent breached his lease by causing a nuisance and by admitted obstructions of the common parts, but did not find a breach of the drunken habits covenant, and he must pay £5,000 towards the applicant's wasted costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay £5,000 towards the applicant's wasted costs of the previous hearing |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
We are satisfied that there have been breaches of clause 2 & 4 of the Second Schedule.
- s20c
We decline to do so.
- costs
we assess the costs which the Respondent should pay in the sum of £5,000 within 28 days of the date of this decision.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.