Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CT13 9PJ

Flat 4 The Haven, North Road, Sandwich Bay, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9PJ

HAV/29UE/LBC/2024/0602 · breach of lease · Dover · decided 16 Oct 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the respondent breached his lease by causing a nuisance and by admitted obstructions of the common parts, but did not find a breach of the drunken habits covenant, and he must pay £5,000 towards the applicant's wasted costs.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay £5,000 towards the applicant's wasted costs of the previous hearing

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
We are satisfied that there have been breaches of clause 2 & 4 of the Second Schedule.
s20c
We decline to do so.
costs
we assess the costs which the Respondent should pay in the sum of £5,000 within 28 days of the date of this decision.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.