Flat 4 Bravo House 241 Whitehorse Lane London SE25 6UU
LON/00AH/LSC/2025/1260 · service charges · Croydon · decided 14 Sep 2026
The tribunal found the applicant had not made a prima facie case against the service charges for 2017 to 2024, so the charges as demanded stand, and it refused the applicant's request that landlord's costs be excluded from the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the Tribunal does not interfere with the service charge demands for years 2017 to 2024 inclusive as challenged
- outcome
the Tribunal does not interfere with the service charge demands for years 2017 to 2024 inclusive as challenged
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.