Flat 4 & 6 Regal Row, London SE15 2NH
LON/00BE/LSC/2020/0163 · service charges · Southwark · decided 4 May 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the service charge and reserve fund arrears claimed for Flats 4 and 6 not payable because the demands were not properly addressed to the correct lessees, and made a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Regal Row Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Regal Row Limited |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose-built unit on three floors containing 8 residential units and 1 commercial unit
- freeholder
Regal Row Limited (Managing Agent)
- agent
Regal Row Limited (Managing Agent)
- years
claimed for the period 01/01/2018 to 01/01/2020
- outcome
are not payable by the lessee(s) of Flat 4.
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order in respect of section 20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of Flat 4 and Flat 6.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.