Flat 4, 2 Dickenson Road, London N8 9EN

LON/00AP/LAC/2025/0611 · administration charges · Haringey · decided 16 Dec 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the landlord's £25,000 premium demanded as a condition of consenting to the flat alterations is not recoverable, and ordered the landlord to repay £341 in tribunal fees and barred it from recovering its costs of the proceedings.

Outcome	Not payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Grey Clyde Investments Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges
Total demanded	£25,000
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to repay the applicant £341 in tribunal fees

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Grey Clyde Investments Limited
outcome: we disallow the amount completely.
items reduced: we disallow the amount completely.
total demanded: a demand for £25,000 made by the respondent landlord
s20c: be barred from recovering the legal and other costs of the current proceedings against the applicants.
costs: The respondent shall pay the applicants £341 in respect of the fees payable to the Tribunal.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.