Flat 4, 132 Mandeville Rd, Aylesbury, Bucks HP21 8AJ
CAM/11UB/LSC/2022/0066 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 9 Aug 2023
The Tribunal found the estimated 2022/23 reserve fund, general repairs and management fee charges reasonable and payable in the leaseholder's one-third share, and refused the leaseholder's application for a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Goodwyn Realty Ltd |
| Management company | 132 Mandeville Road Right to Manage Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,684.16 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a 2 bedroom flat in a block of purpose built block of 4 flats
- freeholder
Respondent Landlord Goodwyn Realty Ltd
- management company
the management of the premises is the responsibility of 132 Mandeville Road Right to Manage Company Ltd
- years
for the service charge year 1 October 2022 to 30 September 2023
- outcome
the Applicant's 1/3 proportion of such costs is therefore payable
- total demanded
in the sum of £1684.16
- s20c
The application by the Applicant under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.