Flat 4, 1 Palace Gate, London, W8 5LS

BIR/00AW/LVM/2018/0002 · variation of a management order · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 1 Mar 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal struck out the leaseholder's application asking the court-appointed manager to credit overpayments from years before his appointment, finding the manager had no duty to reconstruct historic accounts.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat · 3 decisions about this building
Service charge years in dispute	2013, 2014, 2015
Items in dispute	repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: service charge accounting periods 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16
outcome: These proceedings are struck out under Rule 9(3)(e) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.