Flat 3B, 8 Ethelbert Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9PY
CHI/29UN/LBC/2019/0041 · breach of lease · Thanet · decided 9 Oct 2019
figures not yet checkedThe County Court claim for service charges was dismissed because the applicant was not a person entitled to recover the charges claimed, and the tribunal did not assess reasonableness.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 8 Ethelbert Road RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Powell & Co Management Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
8 Ethelbert Road RTM Company Limited (“the RTM Co.”)
- agent
[name] & Co Management Limited (“[name] & Co”) is a company of which he is the sole director
- outcome
The Tribunal confirmed that it dismissed the claim.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.