Flat 3,47 Clapham Common Northside,London,SW4 0AA
LON/00AY/LSC/2025/1169 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 22 Apr 2026
The tribunal found the 2025 interim service charge of £4,911.30 payable in full and allowed only half of the legal costs claimed as administration charges for the earlier 2024 application.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 47 Northside Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £4,911.30 |
| Total found payable | £4,911.30 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold owner/Landlord of 47 [name] Common [name] SW4 0AA
- years
The Tribunal has made findings in relation to the payability and reasonableness of the 2025 interim service charges
- outcome
The administration charges are recoverable in the sum of £3,356.20 representing a 50% reduction in the claimed sum
- items reduced
The administration charge for legal costs is not reasonable and accordingly the costs are reduced by 50%
- total demanded
The 2025 interim service charge in the sum of £4,911.30 is reasonable
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.