Flat 33 Princess House, 144 Princess Street, Manchester, M1 7EP
MAN/00BN/LSC/2020/0044 · service charges · Manchester · decided 13 May 2021
The tribunal found the service charges payable on account and the lift repair costs, management fees and sinking fund demands reasonable, but the management company breached the lease by not providing yearly accounts, so the accounts must be agreed, and a section 20C order was made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Princess House Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Revolution Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 67 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
with 67 apartments and an underground car park
- management company
Respondent : Princess House Management Limited
- agent
Throughout the relevant years the agents have been Revolution Property Management Ltd.
- years
for the years April 2015–2016 to April 2020-21
- outcome
the service charges are payable
- s20c
A section 20C order is made;
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.