Flat 31, 21 Plough Road, London SW11 2DE
LON/00BJ/LSC/2024/0332 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 15 Aug 2025
The tribunal found most of the service charges for 2022 to 2025 reasonable and payable, credited £6,018 of unreasonably incurred heating maintenance costs, and made an order limiting the landlord's costs of the tribunal proceedings to 50% passed through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Plough Road Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Plough Road Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The second respondent is the management company and is a not for profit undertaking.
- years
(i) 1 March 2022 to 28 February 2023
- outcome
Therefore, the tribunal finds that £6,018 has been unreasonably
- items reduced
Therefore, the tribunal finds that £6,018 has been unreasonably
- s20c
for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act, so that the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.