Flat 30 Pembroke House, Fisherton Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP2 7SX
CHI/00HY/LSC/2024/0040 · service charges · Wiltshire · decided 5 Jun 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the tenant's challenge to the 2023/2024 service charges, finding the rise in electricity costs and the retrospective and administration charges payable, with no adjustment made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Stonewater Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 38 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
currently containing 38 self contained one and two bedroom retirement flats on five floors
- freeholder
Respondent : Stonewater Limited
- years
reasonableness of service charges for the year 2023/2024
- outcome
For the above reasons the application fails and no adjustment is made to the service charge payable by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.