Flat 3, The Hartleys, 6-8 Hartley Road, Exmouth EX8 2SG
CHI/18UB/LBC/2019/0051 · breach of lease · East Devon · decided 19 May 2020
The Tribunal found that the leaseholder breached paragraph 8 of the First Schedule by erecting sheds that obstructed the shared driveway, but found no breach of clause 3.3.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Danesdale Land Limited |
| Management company | Remus Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Remus Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 17 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The lessor’s title consists of 17 flats, parking areas, gardens and grounds.
- freeholder
Applicant : Danesdale Land Limited
- management company
Representative : Remus Management Limited
- agent
Mr [name] of Remus Management Limited, the managing agents for the Applicant
- outcome
the Tribunal finds that breaches have been committed in relation to paragraph 8 of the First Schedule and makes a determination accordingly.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.