Flat 3 Royal Arch Apartments, The Mailbox, Wharfside Street, Birmingham, B1 1RB
BIR/00CN/LBC/2020/0002 · breach of lease · Birmingham · decided 14 Jan 2022
The tribunal found that the tenant breached the lease by causing persistent noise nuisance from the flat between January 2019 and July/August 2021, but found no breach of the alterations, access, insurance and carpeting covenants because the managing agent's emails gave conditional consent to the works.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Royal Arch Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 200 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Royal Arch Management Limited
- years
during a period commencing in January 2019 until the date in July/August 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Respondent has breached the covenants at Regulation 3 and Regulation 6 of the Fourth Schedule to the Lease
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.