Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near WA14 2SJ

Flat 3, Heather lea, Bowden, Altrincham, WA14 2SJ

MAN/00BU/LSC/2019/0047 · service charges · Trafford · decided 10 Feb 2020

The tribunal found the £2,035.20 legal fee was properly incurred by the respondent company, with £1,089.60 payable by the applicant as an administration charge and £945.60 payable as a service charge.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyHeather Lea (Services) Ltd
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£2,035.20
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
It is one of four prestigious flats in a former Victorian mansion house.
freeholder
of [name] Freehold Ltd, the owner of the freehold and Lessor.
management company
the Respondent as the Management Company acted on behalf of the Lessor.
outcome
The Respondent has properly incurred legal costs as set out in the invoice of JMW totalling £2,035.20.
total demanded
The Respondent has properly incurred legal costs as set out in the invoice of JMW totalling £2,035.20.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.