Flat 3, Halstead Court, 36 Verulam Avenue, London, E17 8EW
LON/00BH/LSC/2021/0308 · service charges · Waltham Forest · decided 8 Feb 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the landlord's proposed bin storage system works payable and reasonable, and refused an order under section 20C and a refund of the tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Orbit Housing Association |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Halstead Court is a block of 23 purpose built flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Orbit Housing Association
- years
in respect of the service charge year 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the landlord’s proposed expenditure in installing a new bin storage system and locating the bins is both payable and reasonable.
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.