Flat 3 Dolphin Court, 42 Carleton Road, London N7 0ER
LON/00AU/LSC/2020/0030 · service charges · Islington · decided 26 Feb 2021
The tribunal extinguished the leaseholder's liability to pay an administration charge for the landlord's litigation costs under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 and dismissed the landlord's application for costs in the county court.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,086 |
| Total found payable | £1,515.57 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent's application for costs dismissed |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
£796.26 being attributable to 2017-18 and £719.31 to 2019.
- outcome
The Tribunal orders in accordance with paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that the Applicant’s liability to pay an administration charge for litigation costs
- total demanded
claiming £3,086 in service and administration charges
- total payable
a total of £1,515.57 was payable by the Applicant
- costs
The court dismisses the Respondent/Claimant’s application for costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.