Flat 3 Craven Court, 29-31 Craven Road, London W2 3BX S
LON/00BK/LSC/2018/0330 · service charges · Westminster · decided 14 Jun 2019
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the applicant £7,345.70 for service charges for 2014 to 2017, found administration charges of £887.35 not payable by the applicant, and ordered a refund of the £300 tribunal fees to the applicant.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £7,345.70 |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to refund tribunal fees of £300 to the applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charges for the years 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017
- outcome
Administration Charges of £887.35 are not payable by the applicant
- items reduced
Administration Charges of £887.35 are not payable by the applicant
- total payable
The total amount to be paid by the respondent is £7,345.70.
- costs
Tribunal fees of £300 to be refunded to the applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 28 Feb 2019.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.