Flat 3, 405 Goldhawk Road, London W6 0SA
LON/00AN/LSC/2023/0040 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 22 Sep 2023
The Tribunal found the service charges for 2021/22 and 2022/23 payable and reasonable in full, totalling £4,443.23, and rejected the claimed set-off for damage to the front door.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Marvelhouse Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,443.23 |
| Total found payable | £4,443.23 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are six flats in the building.
- freeholder
Marvelhouse is the freeholder.
- years
(i) For the year ended 31 March 2022, the sum of £1,699.42 (ii) For the year ended 31 March 2023, the sum of £3,783.81.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that in relation to the items challenged in the Application the following sums are payable and reasonable (as service charge):
- total demanded
Service Charges: £4443.23
- total payable
she therefore owes the sum of £4,443.23 in total for the two years in question.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.