Flat 3, 33 Enys Road, Eastbourne, BN21 2DH
CHI/21UC/LAC/2018/0013 · administration charges · Eastbourne · decided 9 Apr 2019
The tribunal determined that on-account service charges of £5,161.04 for 2017/18 and 2018/19 were reasonable and payable, that administration charges of £936 are payable once demanded, and refused the section 20C order and reimbursement of the application fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rat Records Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £5,161.04 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear own application fee; reimbursement of the application fee refused |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Rat Records Limited
- years
The service charge years at issue are said to be 2017 to 2020
- outcome
The Tribunal determines the following amounts are reasonable and payable;
- total payable
Total £5,161.04
- s20c
Section 20C Order not to be made.
- costs
Reimbursement of the application fee is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.