Flat 3, 29 Victoria Embankment, Nottingham, NG2 2JY
BIR/00FY/LIS/2023/0007 · LIS · Nottingham · decided 1 Sep 2023
The tribunal found service charges of £3,665.45 and administration and contractual costs of £2,110.00 payable, rejected the unsupported defence, and the county court entered judgment for £6,330.45 including court costs.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chase Midland VCT Limited |
| Management company | Victoria Embankment Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,775.45 |
| Total found payable | £5,775.45 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay issue fee and legal costs on the summons totalling £555.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
(1) Chase Midland VCT Limited (Landlord)
- management company
[name] Management Company Ltd
- outcome
the Tribunal therefore makes a summary determination that the service charges demanded of £3,665.45 were reasonably incurred.
- total demanded
claiming arrears of service charge contributions in the sum of £5,775.45
- total payable
The sum of £5,775.45 is payable by Mr [name]
- costs
Issue costs and legal costs on the summons totalling £555.00 are payable
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.