Flat 3, 25, Priory Road, London, NW6 4NN
LON/00AG/LSC/2019/0156 · service charges · Camden · decided 8 Aug 2019
The tribunal found most of the disputed service charges payable, but limited the leaseholder's contribution to the damp works to £250 because there had been no consultation, and reduced the surveyor's fee to exclude VAT.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £20,178.63 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been divided into four flats
- years
for various issues in the 2014/5 to 2019/20 service charge years
- outcome
Damp Works £1,330.00 £332.50 £250.00
- items reduced
Damp Works £1,330.00 £332.50 £250.00
- total demanded
The application form indicated that the sum in dispute was £20,178.63
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
There had been no consultation, therefore
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.